![[1.1.4.4] Resemblance mistaken for synonymous](https://www.notion.so/icons/kind_lightgray.svg?mode=light){kind=icon}
- Leadership as a personality (combination of traits)
- Leadership as a (set of) skills
- Leadership as a group process
- Leadership as an act or behaviour
- Leadership in relation to the follower.
We associate leadership with almost everything. Being a manager, a hero, an expert, a professional. Yes, often they share traits, behaviours or have other commonalities that can be present in the same person. But that doesn't mean they are the same. Just because it 'quack's' like a duck, doesn't mean it is a duck.
A Couple of examples of association
Leadership and Management are distinct constructs. They have an overlap, yet are not equal opposites. One can be both leader and manager, just a leader or just a manager, or neither. We need to be aware of not mistaking them for synonymous (or equal opposites).
We often associate leadership with an achievement; a cultural change, a scientific breakthrough, a display of courage in time of need. This promotes the idea of leaders as hero's or role models. But is real leadership not about elevating others? Staying in the background as you enable others to 'shine'. Can the most beautiful leadership not be found in humbleness?
Some see leaders as an industry expert, or a guru. Somebody who knows a lot about a certain topics, or has mastered a certain skill. And yes, leaders often posses specific knowledge. But does it teach them to lead as well? Mastery can make a master, but does it also make a leader?
How often have you heard: "look at him; he's a real talent" or "she really shows leadership potential". And vice-versa; "you really should work on your leadership skills". What does that even mean? Even our promotion system makes us think we all should become leaders. Those who 'made' it are carried on golden platters. This creates the idea that leadership is some sort of holy grail for all of us to pursue.
Made with Bullet